Item And Measurements


Variables


Result

Hypothesis
Smart Perceived Security Risk (SPSR)
Not Supported
H1: Smart perceived security risk (SPSR) has negative influence on behavioural intention (BI).
Smart Perceived Trust (SPT)
Supported
H2: Smart perceived trust (SPT) has positive influence on behavioural intention
Performance Expectancy (PE)
Supported
H3: Performance expectancy (PE) has positive influence on behavioural intention (BI)
Effort Expectancy (EE)
Supported
H4: Effort expectancy (EE) has positive influence on behavioural intention (BI)
Social Influence (SI)
Not Supported
H5: Social influence (SI) has positive influence on behavioural intention (BI)
Facilitating Conditions (FC)
Not Supported
H6: Facilitating conditions (FC) has positive influence on behavioural intention (BI)
Hedonic Motivation (HM)
Supported
H7a: Experience is positively moderating the relationship between hedonic motivation (HM) and behavioural intention (BI)
Price Value (PV)
Supported
H8: Price value (PV) has positive influence on behavioural intention (BI)
Habit (HB)
Not Supported
H9: Habit (HB) has positive influence on behavioural intention (BI)
BI (Behavioural Intention)
Supported
The more experience the user has in using a computer, the more likely they are aware of the security risk that would be brought by smart system such as IoT.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

About Lecture

Theory Involved